Construction Litigation Paralegal (Charleston)

Location: Charleston

We are searching for experienced Complex Litigation Paralegals to support construction litigation and complex litigation cases. If you’re looking to elevate your career by working on high-stakes, challenging legal matters, this is the opportunity for you! How does it benefit you? Work on complex and high-profile cases with top-tier legal professionals Competitive compensation and benefits dependent upon experience Career growth opportunities within well-established firms A dynamic, collaborative team environment ranging from small, boutique firms to large firms with multiple exciting practice areas Opportunities for cross-practice collaboration and exposure to various areas of law What You’ll Do: Handle complex case management and legal research from discovery through trial and post-trial Prepare and serve pleadings, subpoenas, motions, and trial documents Manage case files, databases, and organize detailed case chronologies Draft and respond to discovery, including interrogatories, requests for production, and requests to admit Assist in all aspects of trial preparation for complex litigation cases Collaborate closely with attorneys and clients to ensure smooth case progression What You Bring: MUST have 2-6 years of experience as a litigation paralegal, particularly in complex litigation matters Must have experience in either Construction Law or other Complex LItigation Bachelor’s or Associate’s degree in Paralegal Studies or Paralegal Certificate Strong communication skills, both written and verbal High-level organizational skills to manage intricate case details and deadlines Experience with SC Civil Procedure Rules Familiarity with e-filing and case management systems Must be willing to work onsite If you're ready to take on challenging and rewarding work in complex litigation, apply now! Let’s achieve legal excellence together. All resumes are kept strictly confidential. Note: This description provides a general overview of the position and is not exhaustive.

Apply